|Owner of Olympic Village project goes into receivership|
Nov 19, 2010 Jeff Lee Vancouver Sun
Vancouver — The troubled Vancouver Olympic village project went into receivership Wednesday when the city took control of the project in an effort to recoup $740 million in taxpayer funds.
In a last-minute arranged deal to stave off legal action, Millennium Southeast False Creek Properties agreed to relinquish control to court-appointed receiver Ernst & Young. It followed a lengthy dispute with the city over how Millennium would repay its loans in the face of a growing gap between the value of the assets and its legal obligations.
But the deal doesn’t include any assurances that taxpayers will get back all of the money the city loaned, Mayor Gregor Robertson said. That will depend on how well Ernst & Young does in selling the remaining 480 units, and whether the city can obtain value from a string of non-village assets Millennium pledged as security.
The city was preparing to go to B.C. Supreme Court to petition Millennium into receivership when the company’s owners, Shahram and Peter Malek, agreed to the voluntary assignment to protect the integrity of the project, city manager Penny Ballem said.
The arrangement means the Maleks are “no longer in control” of the project but remain financially obligated to cover the debt owed to the city, she said. Neither the project nor the Maleks are in bankruptcy, she said, noting the city had simply assumed control of the Olympic Village. The brothers remain the technical owners of the project but the receiver now has total jurisdiction.
Robertson described the arrangement as “good news” for the city because it would bring stability to the project and improve the city’s chances of recouping most of the money it had loaned to Millennium.
“Today’s announcement of a negotiated agreement with Millennium is good news for the Olympic village and will result in a new sense of stability and confidence in the project,” Robertson said.
“It is both in the best interests of Vancouver taxpayers and the long-term health of the village.”
Both Ballem and Robertson offered compliments to the Maleks, saying they had built a remarkable village that continues to win awards for its construction and sustainability. But they said the city still needed assurance that the taxpayers’ loans would be repaid, and saw no other way but for the city to take control of the project.
Neither the mayor nor Ballem could say whether taxpayers will get back all of the money, including the balance of a $193-million sale of city-owned land on which the village sits.
“I have never said that the taxpayers were risk-free on this project. For the last two years since daylighting the financial details, I have said the taxpayers are on the hook,” Robertson said. “Those risks continue. It all hinges on the sales of those condos and the years to come.”
The Maleks were noticeably absent from the late-afternoon news conference, which was held shortly after the city obtained a Supreme Court order stipulating Ernst & Young as the receiver. The Maleks declined to comment. The city said the brothers had signed a non-disclosure agreement.
Ballem rejected a suggestion that the negotiated agreement was in essence a “shotgun wedding” because the city was prepared to go to court to petition Millennium into receivership. She said the agreement means neither side can now sue the other and the best interests of the project are paramount.
It also means that Millennium has to turn over to the city all of its pledged assets, a modest array of commercial and residential investment properties. Many of those are encumbered with debts and it was unclear how much the city will get for them if it wants to dispose of them to cover any shortfall between village condo sales and the overall debt, Ballem said.
Larry Prentice, a partner with Ernst & Young, said he will meet with marketer Bob Rennie to map out a strategy for resuming sales. Rennie remained involved in the project and sales were expected to resume in the New Year.
Rennie said in a telephone interview the receivership was inevitable, but that the Maleks and the city appeared to want to avoid further damaging the value of the asset by getting into what could be lengthy and ugly court fights.
Rennie said he’s been told he will remain as the marketer of the project and he expects to begin advertising units again by late January or early February.
“Everybody can say what they want, but I think the city made a really tough business decison and the Maleks made a decision that was in the best interests of the project. Both parents are looking after the child,” he said.
Coun. Suzanne Anton, the lone Non-Partisan Association councillor, said the mayor was reaping what he had sowed by constantly badmouthing the village until it became clear that no one was willing to buy into it.
“Ever time he opened his mouth he put a black cloud over the village,” Anton said.”How much value has been lost on the property because of that is uncountable.”
You may help and contribute by posting your thoughts and adding comments to all articles. The Forum actively encourages your voice at any time. All opinions are appreciated.