| CMHC: Canada's Freddie and Fannie? |
|
|
|
Oct 21, 2009 Diane Francis network.nationalpost.com Canada's risky real estate business where residential may take a big fall Ottawa has been creating a housing bubble in Canada with taxpayer money which is why residential real estate prices rise in defiance of high unemployment and recession. Ottawa's low interest rate policy and crown agency Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's dramatic increase in mortgage backstopping, for people who put only 5% down, have pushed upward activity and prices. Some, such as Post reader and accountant, Derek Bruce, worry that the Tories are allowing CMHC to become like Freddie and Fannie south of the border, a rogue financial institution the size of one of our big five commercial banks. “Last year alone, CHMC did 919,780 deals worth a staggering C$148 billion, or about twice what it had planned. To accommodate that, the feds have raised its allowable insured mortgage limit to C$600 billion, or about double what it was two years ago,” wrote author, former MP Garth Turner. Uh oh This is a looming problem which flies in the face of Ottawa’s smugness about its superior regulatory regime and Canadian banking conservatism.
Thus Canada's real estate markets are hitting highs in the middle of the worst recession since the Great Depression. “Since CMHC is insuring so many mortgages, the banks have no incentive to test the credit worthiness of home purchasers. Then the mortgages can be neatly packed into MBS securities and have a CMHC 100% Canadian guarantee on the back of the investments thus insuring end-investors these papers are insured from loss,” wrote Bruce. Distortions Some may argue this is simply another stimulus strategy, but this is canceled out by the fact that it encourages bad and unfair behavior and banking practices. It also has serious monetary/currency implications because air will eventually have to be let out of the bubble by imposing higher interest rates. This will mean a higher Canadian dollar. The question is why should taxpayers be involved in this when it shoots them collectively in the foot? Why shouldn’t banks have skin in the game? And home buyers? If not, why shouldn’t they share the upside with taxpayers? Aussie medicine |
| Related Information | |
You may help and contribute by posting your thoughts and adding comments to all articles. The Forum actively encourages your voice at any time. All opinions are appreciated.